On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:33:11AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 21:27:08 -0400
> Peter Xu wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 06:03:44PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:41:59AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > It's worth putting history
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 21:27:08 -0400
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 06:03:44PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:41:59AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > It's worth putting history excavation with explanation what is broken and
> > > why
> > > compat stuff is
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 06:03:44PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:41:59AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > It's worth putting history excavation with explanation what is broken and
> > why
> > compat stuff is being ignored in the patch.
>
> Makes sense, I'll amend the commit
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:41:59AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> It's worth putting history excavation with explanation what is broken and why
> compat stuff is being ignored in the patch.
Makes sense, I'll amend the commit message and repost. Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:20:34 +0200
Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:40:01 -0400
> Peter Xu wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 03:46:17PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:12:27 -0400
> > > Peter Xu wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's true that when
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:40:01 -0400
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 03:46:17PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:12:27 -0400
> > Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> > > It's true that when vcpus<=255 we don't require the length of 32bit APIC
> > > IDs. However here since we
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 03:46:17PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:12:27 -0400
> Peter Xu wrote:
>
> > It's true that when vcpus<=255 we don't require the length of 32bit APIC
> > IDs. However here since we already have EIM=ON it means the hypervisor
> > will declare the VM
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 09:32:54AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > +if (!kvm_enable_x2apic()) {
> > +error_setg(errp, "eim=on requires support on the KVM side"
> > + "(X2APIC_API, first shipped in v4.7)");
> > +return false;
> > +}
>
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:12:27 -0400
Peter Xu wrote:
> It's true that when vcpus<=255 we don't require the length of 32bit APIC
> IDs. However here since we already have EIM=ON it means the hypervisor
> will declare the VM as x2apic supported (e.g. VT-d ECAP register will have
> EIM bit 4 set),
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:12 AM Peter Xu wrote:
>
> It's true that when vcpus<=255 we don't require the length of 32bit APIC
> IDs. However here since we already have EIM=ON it means the hypervisor
> will declare the VM as x2apic supported (e.g. VT-d ECAP register will have
> EIM bit 4 set), so
It's true that when vcpus<=255 we don't require the length of 32bit APIC
IDs. However here since we already have EIM=ON it means the hypervisor
will declare the VM as x2apic supported (e.g. VT-d ECAP register will have
EIM bit 4 set), so the guest should assume the APIC IDs are 32bits width
even
11 matches
Mail list logo