Re: [PATCH] bsd-user: improve support for sparc syscall flags

2020-01-25 Thread Salvador Fandiño
On 25/1/20 16:52, Laurent Vivier wrote: Le 25/01/2020 à 12:55, no-re...@patchew.org a écrit : Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200125114753.61820-1-salva...@qindel.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Salvador, you

Re: [PATCH] bsd-user: improve support for sparc syscall flags

2020-01-25 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 25/01/2020 à 12:55, no-re...@patchew.org a écrit : > Patchew URL: > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200125114753.61820-1-salva...@qindel.com/ > > > > Hi, > > This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for > more information: > Salvador, you can use

Re: [PATCH] bsd-user: improve support for sparc syscall flags

2020-01-25 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200125114753.61820-1-salva...@qindel.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Message-id: 20200125114753.61820-1-salva...@qindel.com Subject: [PATCH] bsd-user: improve support

[PATCH] bsd-user: improve support for sparc syscall flags

2020-01-25 Thread salvador
From: Salvador Fandino Under sparc and sparc64, both NetBSD and OpenSSH use two bits of the syscall number as flags. Until now, those bits where only supported for sparc64 when emulating OpenBSD. This patch extends support for syscall flags to the sparc architecture and NetBSD emulation. It had

Re: [PATCH] bsd-user: improve support for sparc syscall flags

2020-01-24 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200124223118.58596-1-salva...@qindel.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Message-id: 20200124223118.58596-1-salva...@qindel.com Subject: [PATCH] bsd-user: improve support

[PATCH] bsd-user: improve support for sparc syscall flags

2020-01-24 Thread salvador
From: Salvador Fandino Under sparc and sparc64, both NetBSD and OpenSSH use two bits of the syscall number as flags. Until now, those bits where only supported for sparc64 when emulating OpenBSD. This patch extends support for syscall flags to the sparc architecture and NetBSD emulation. It had

Re: [PATCH] bsd-user: improve support for sparc syscall flags

2020-01-24 Thread Salvador Fandiño
On 24/1/20 20:44, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200124183113.58039-1-salva...@qindel.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: A new patch is coming fixing the errors found by patchew in

Re: [PATCH] bsd-user: improve support for sparc syscall flags

2020-01-24 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200124183113.58039-1-salva...@qindel.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Message-id: 20200124183113.58039-1-salva...@qindel.com Subject: [PATCH] bsd-user: improve support

[PATCH] bsd-user: improve support for sparc syscall flags

2020-01-24 Thread salvador
From: Salvador Fandino Under sparc and sparc64, both NetBSD and OpenSSH use two bits of the syscall number as flags. Until now, those bits where only supported for sparc64 when emulating OpenBSD. This patch extends support for syscall flags to the sparc architecture and NetBSD emulation. It had