On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 05:08:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:51:44PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 09:37:20AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 05:09:23PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > It was
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:51:44PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 09:37:20AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 05:09:23PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > It was reported that enabling SafeStack reduces IOPS significantly
> > > (>25%) with the
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 10:30:09PM -0400, Daniele Buono wrote:
> Stefan, the patch looks great.
> Thank you for debugging the performance issue that was happening with
> SafeStack.
>
> On 9/2/2021 4:10 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 05:09:23PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 09:37:20AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 05:09:23PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > It was reported that enabling SafeStack reduces IOPS significantly
> > (>25%) with the following fio benchmark on virtio-blk using a NVMe host
> > block
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 05:09:23PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> It was reported that enabling SafeStack reduces IOPS significantly
> (>25%) with the following fio benchmark on virtio-blk using a NVMe host
> block device:
>
> # fio --rw=randrw --bs=4k --iodepth=64 --runtime=1m --direct=1 \
>
Stefan, the patch looks great.
Thank you for debugging the performance issue that was happening with
SafeStack.
On 9/2/2021 4:10 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 05:09:23PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
It was reported that enabling SafeStack reduces IOPS significantly
(>25%)
On 9/1/21 6:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> It was reported that enabling SafeStack reduces IOPS significantly
> (>25%) with the following fio benchmark on virtio-blk using a NVMe host
> block device:
>
> # fio --rw=randrw --bs=4k --iodepth=64 --runtime=1m --direct=1 \
>
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 05:09:23PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> It was reported that enabling SafeStack reduces IOPS significantly
> (>25%) with the following fio benchmark on virtio-blk using a NVMe host
> block device:
>
> # fio --rw=randrw --bs=4k --iodepth=64 --runtime=1m --direct=1 \
>
It was reported that enabling SafeStack reduces IOPS significantly
(>25%) with the following fio benchmark on virtio-blk using a NVMe host
block device:
# fio --rw=randrw --bs=4k --iodepth=64 --runtime=1m --direct=1 \
--filename=/dev/vdb --name=job1 --ioengine=libaio --thread \