On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 11:45, Jean-Philippe Brucker
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:19:30AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 09:07, Jean-Philippe Brucker
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Since commit 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic"),
> > > GIC maintenance
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:19:30AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 09:07, Jean-Philippe Brucker
> wrote:
> >
> > Since commit 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic"),
> > GIC maintenance IRQ registration fails on arm64:
> >
> > [0.979743] kvm [1]: Cannot r
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 09:07, Jean-Philippe Brucker
wrote:
>
> Since commit 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic"),
> GIC maintenance IRQ registration fails on arm64:
>
> [0.979743] kvm [1]: Cannot register interrupt 9
>
> That commit re-defined VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ to be a INTID
Since commit 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic"),
GIC maintenance IRQ registration fails on arm64:
[0.979743] kvm [1]: Cannot register interrupt 9
That commit re-defined VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ to be a INTID but missed a case
where the maintenance IRQ is actually referred by its
