On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 6:18 PM wrote:
>
> From: Frank Chang
>
> oprsz and maxsz are passed with the same value in commit: eee2d61e202.
> However, vmv.v.v was missed in that commit and should pass the same
> value as well in its tcg_gen_gvec_2_ptr() call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Chang
Thanks!
On 10/7/21 1:17 AM, frank.ch...@sifive.com wrote:
From: Frank Chang
oprsz and maxsz are passed with the same value in commit: eee2d61e202.
However, vmv.v.v was missed in that commit and should pass the same
value as well in its tcg_gen_gvec_2_ptr() call.
Signed-off-by: Frank Chang
---
From: Frank Chang
oprsz and maxsz are passed with the same value in commit: eee2d61e202.
However, vmv.v.v was missed in that commit and should pass the same
value as well in its tcg_gen_gvec_2_ptr() call.
Signed-off-by: Frank Chang
---
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 3 ++-
1 file
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:48 PM LIU Zhiwei wrote:
>
> Since commit e2e7168a214b0ed98dc357bba96816486a289762, if oprsz
> is still zero(as we don't use this field), simd_desc will trigger an
> assert.
>
> Besides, tcg_gen_gvec_*_ptr calls simd_desc in it's implementation.
> Here we pass the value
On 5/20/21 10:48 PM, LIU Zhiwei wrote:
Since commit e2e7168a214b0ed98dc357bba96816486a289762, if oprsz
is still zero(as we don't use this field), simd_desc will trigger an
assert.
Besides, tcg_gen_gvec_*_ptr calls simd_desc in it's implementation.
Here we pass the value to maxsz and oprsz to
Since commit e2e7168a214b0ed98dc357bba96816486a289762, if oprsz
is still zero(as we don't use this field), simd_desc will trigger an
assert.
Besides, tcg_gen_gvec_*_ptr calls simd_desc in it's implementation.
Here we pass the value to maxsz and oprsz to bypass the assert.
Signed-off-by: LIU