Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:29:45AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:38:06AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> >> Eduardo Habkost writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:14:30PM +0100, Dr.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:29:45AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:38:06AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> Eduardo Habkost writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:14:30PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >> >> *
* Vitaly Kuznetsov (vkuzn...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:38:06AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> Eduardo Habkost writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:14:30PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >> >> * Paolo Bonzini
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:38:06AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Eduardo Habkost writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:14:30PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>> >> * Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> >> > On 06/04/21 13:42, Vitaly
* Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:38:06AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > Eduardo Habkost writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:14:30PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > >> * Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > >> > On
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:38:06AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Eduardo Habkost writes:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:14:30PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >> * Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >> > On 06/04/21 13:42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> > > older machine
Eduardo Habkost writes:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:14:30PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>> * Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> > On 06/04/21 13:42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> > > older machine types are still available (I disable it for <= 5.1 but we
>> > > can consider
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:14:30PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On 06/04/21 13:42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > > older machine types are still available (I disable it for <= 5.1 but we
> > > can consider disabling it for 5.2 too). The
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 06/04/21 13:42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > older machine types are still available (I disable it for <= 5.1 but we
> > can consider disabling it for 5.2 too). The feature is upstream since
> > Linux 5.8, I know that QEMU supports much older
On 06/04/21 13:42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
older machine types are still available (I disable it for <= 5.1 but we
can consider disabling it for 5.2 too). The feature is upstream since
Linux 5.8, I know that QEMU supports much older kernels but this doesn't
probably mean that we can't enable new
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 01/04/21 17:19, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> I noticed two issues with 'kvm-asyncpf-int' enablement:
>> 1) We forgot to add to to kvm_default_props[] so it doesn't get enabled
>> automatically (unless '-cpu host' is used or the feature is enabled
>> manually on the
On 01/04/21 17:19, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
I noticed two issues with 'kvm-asyncpf-int' enablement:
1) We forgot to add to to kvm_default_props[] so it doesn't get enabled
automatically (unless '-cpu host' is used or the feature is enabled
manually on the command line)
2) We forgot to disable
I noticed two issues with 'kvm-asyncpf-int' enablement:
1) We forgot to add to to kvm_default_props[] so it doesn't get enabled
automatically (unless '-cpu host' is used or the feature is enabled
manually on the command line)
2) We forgot to disable it for older machine types to preserve
13 matches
Mail list logo
