Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 18.05.23 14:23, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> The problem I want to solve is that guest-panicked state may be lost
>>> when migration is failed (or cancelled) after source stop.
>>>
>>> Still, I try to go f
On 18.05.23 14:23, Juan Quintela wrote:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all.
The problem I want to solve is that guest-panicked state may be lost
when migration is failed (or cancelled) after source stop.
Still, I try to go further and restore all possible paused states in the
same way
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> The problem I want to solve is that guest-panicked state may be lost
> when migration is failed (or cancelled) after source stop.
>
> Still, I try to go further and restore all possible paused states in the
> same way. The key patch is the last one
Hi all.
The problem I want to solve is that guest-panicked state may be lost
when migration is failed (or cancelled) after source stop.
Still, I try to go further and restore all possible paused states in the
same way. The key patch is the last one and others are refactoring and
preparation.
Vla
