On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:32 AM Peter Maydell
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 17:08, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > Apart from "a more perfect emulation" is there a particular use case
> > served by the extra functionality? AIUI up until this point we've
> > basically supported glibc's use of clone()
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 17:08, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Apart from "a more perfect emulation" is there a particular use case
> served by the extra functionality? AIUI up until this point we've
> basically supported glibc's use of clone() which has generally been
> enough. I'm assuming you've come
Josh Kunz writes:
> This patch series implements extended support for the `clone` system
> call. As best I can tell, any option combination including `CLONE_VM`
> should be supported with the addition of this patch series. The
> implementation is described in greater detail in the patches
Josh Kunz writes:
> This patch series implements extended support for the `clone` system
> call. As best I can tell, any option combination including `CLONE_VM`
> should be supported with the addition of this patch series. The
> implementation is described in greater detail in the patches
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200612014606.147691-1-...@google.com/
Hi,
This series failed the docker-quick@centos7 build test. Please find the testing
commands and
their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
This patch series implements extended support for the `clone` system
call. As best I can tell, any option combination including `CLONE_VM`
should be supported with the addition of this patch series. The
implementation is described in greater detail in the patches themselves.
Testing:
* All
