On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:33:06PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 11:13:40 +0100
> Greg Kurz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:11:42 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:47:52AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This is a
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 11:13:40 +0100
Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:11:42 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:47:52AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is a followup to a previous cleanup for the sPAPR code:
> > >
> > >
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:11:42 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:47:52AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a followup to a previous cleanup for the sPAPR code:
> >
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-09/msg04860.html
> >
> > The last two
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:47:52AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a followup to a previous cleanup for the sPAPR code:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-09/msg04860.html
>
> The last two patches had to be dropped because they were wrongly assuming
> that
Hi,
This is a followup to a previous cleanup for the sPAPR code:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-09/msg04860.html
The last two patches had to be dropped because they were wrongly assuming
that object_property_get_uint() returning zero meant failure. This led to
a discussion
