On 1/22/21 11:46 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:06:24 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/21/21 12:50 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:54:22 +0100
Niklas Schnelle wrote:
On 1/21/21 3:46 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/21/21 2:37 PM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:06:24 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 1/21/21 12:50 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:54:22 +0100
> > Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> >
> >> On 1/21/21 3:46 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 1/21/21 2:37 PM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>
> >>>
On 1/21/21 12:50 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:54:22 +0100
Niklas Schnelle wrote:
On 1/21/21 3:46 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/21/21 2:37 PM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
On 1/21/21 1:30 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
Just wanted to say that we've had a very similar discussion
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:54:22 +0100
Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On 1/21/21 3:46 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/21/21 2:37 PM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/21/21 1:30 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> >
>
> Just wanted to say that we've had a very similar discussion
On 1/21/21 3:42 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/21/21 3:27 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/20/21 9:29 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/20/21 2:18 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
...snip...
So we have:
devices supporting MIO and MSIX
devices not supporting MIO nor MSIX
devices not supporting the us
On 1/21/21 3:46 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
>
> On 1/21/21 2:37 PM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/21/21 1:30 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
Just wanted to say that we've had a very similar discussion with
Cornelia end of last year and came to the conclusion that explicitly
On 1/21/21 2:37 PM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
On 1/21/21 1:30 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
Just wanted to say that we've had a very similar discussion with
Cornelia end of last year and came to the conclusion that explicitly
matching the PFT is likely the safest bet:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1
On 1/21/21 3:27 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/20/21 9:29 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/20/21 2:18 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
...snip...
So we have:
devices supporting MIO and MSIX
devices not supporting MIO nor MSIX
devices not supporting the use of PCISTG to emulate PCISTB
The first two a
On 1/21/21 1:30 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
>
> On 1/21/21 10:58 AM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/21/21 9:27 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/20/21 9:29 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/20/21 2:18 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
>
>>> ...snip...
>>>
So, I mean I ca
On 1/21/21 10:58 AM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
On 1/21/21 9:27 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/20/21 9:29 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/20/21 2:18 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
...snip...
So, I mean I can change the code to be more permissive in that way (allow any
device that doesn't have
On 1/21/21 9:27 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
>
> On 1/20/21 9:29 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> On 1/20/21 2:18 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>>
>>>
> ...snip...
>
>>
>> So, I mean I can change the code to be more permissive in that way (allow
>> any device that doesn't have MSI-X capability to at lea
On 1/20/21 9:29 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/20/21 2:18 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
...snip...
So we have:
devices supporting MIO and MSIX
devices not supporting MIO nor MSIX
devices not supporting the use of PCISTG to emulate PCISTB
The first two are two different things indicated by two
On 1/20/21 2:18 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/20/21 4:59 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/20/21 9:45 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/20/21 3:03 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/20/21 4:12 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/19/21 9:44 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
Today, ISM devices are completely disallo
On 1/20/21 4:59 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/20/21 9:45 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/20/21 3:03 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/20/21 4:12 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/19/21 9:44 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci
passthrough as
QEMU re
On 1/20/21 9:45 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/20/21 3:03 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/20/21 4:12 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/19/21 9:44 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci
passthrough as
QEMU rejects the device due to an (inappropriate) MSI
On 1/20/21 3:03 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 1/20/21 4:12 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/19/21 9:44 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci passthrough as
QEMU rejects the device due to an (inappropriate) MSI-X check. Removing
this fence, however,
On 1/20/21 4:12 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 1/19/21 9:44 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci passthrough as
QEMU rejects the device due to an (inappropriate) MSI-X check. Removing
this fence, however, reveals additional deficiencies in the s390x
On 1/19/21 9:44 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci passthrough as
QEMU rejects the device due to an (inappropriate) MSI-X check. Removing
this fence, however, reveals additional deficiencies in the s390x PCI
interception layer that prevent ISM
Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci passthrough as
QEMU rejects the device due to an (inappropriate) MSI-X check. Removing
this fence, however, reveals additional deficiencies in the s390x PCI
interception layer that prevent ISM devices from working correctly.
Namely, ISM blo
19 matches
Mail list logo
