On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:57:21AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 07:27:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > The various targets which define versioned machine types have
> > a bunch of obfuscated macro code for defining unique function
> > and variable names using string
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:34:49PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 01/05/2024 20.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > The various targets which define versioned machine types have
> > a bunch of obfuscated macro code for defining unique function
> > and variable names using string concatenation.
> >
On 02/05/2024 16.57, Eric Blake wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 07:27:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
The various targets which define versioned machine types have
a bunch of obfuscated macro code for defining unique function
and variable names using string concatenation.
This addes a
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 07:27:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The various targets which define versioned machine types have
> a bunch of obfuscated macro code for defining unique function
> and variable names using string concatenation.
>
> This addes a couple of helpers to improve the
On 01/05/2024 20.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
The various targets which define versioned machine types have
a bunch of obfuscated macro code for defining unique function
and variable names using string concatenation.
This addes a couple of helpers to improve the clarity of such
code macro.
The various targets which define versioned machine types have
a bunch of obfuscated macro code for defining unique function
and variable names using string concatenation.
This addes a couple of helpers to improve the clarity of such
code macro.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
---
