Hi,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 10:24, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:07:37PM -0400, Robert Foley wrote:
> > +#define UC_DEBUG 0
> > +#if UC_DEBUG && defined(CONFIG_TSAN)
> > +#define UC_TRACE(fmt, ...) fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:%p " fmt "\n", \
> > +__func__, __LINE__,
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:07:37PM -0400, Robert Foley wrote:
>> +#define UC_DEBUG 0
>> +#if UC_DEBUG && defined(CONFIG_TSAN)
>> +#define UC_TRACE(fmt, ...) fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:%p " fmt "\n", \
>> +__func__, __LINE__, __tsan_get_current_fiber(), ##__VA_ARGS__);
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:07:37PM -0400, Robert Foley wrote:
> +#define UC_DEBUG 0
> +#if UC_DEBUG && defined(CONFIG_TSAN)
> +#define UC_TRACE(fmt, ...) fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:%p " fmt "\n", \
> +__func__, __LINE__, __tsan_get_current_fiber(), ##__VA_ARGS__);
> +#else
> +#define UC_TRACE(fmt,
On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 12:55, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> On 5/22/20 6:07 PM, Robert Foley wrote:
> > From: Lingfeng Yang
> >
> > We tried running QEMU under tsan in 2016, but tsan's lack of support for
> > longjmp-based fibers was a blocker:
> > @@ -6277,6 +6304,14 @@ if
Hi Robert,
On 5/22/20 6:07 PM, Robert Foley wrote:
> From: Lingfeng Yang
>
> We tried running QEMU under tsan in 2016, but tsan's lack of support for
> longjmp-based fibers was a blocker:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/thread-sanitizer/se0YuzfWazw
>
> Fortunately, thread sanitizer
From: Lingfeng Yang
We tried running QEMU under tsan in 2016, but tsan's lack of support for
longjmp-based fibers was a blocker:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/thread-sanitizer/se0YuzfWazw
Fortunately, thread sanitizer gained fiber support in early 2019:
