On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 2:42 PM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Because at the time I wrote the patch, blk_pwrite_zeroes() was a
> coroutine_fn. :)
>
> It is called from bdrv_co_create_opts_simple which is coroutine_fn and
> performs I/O, so it should be a coroutine_fn. I have a few more patches
> to not
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 5:12 PM Alberto Campinho Faria
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:49 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Callers of coroutine_fn must be coroutine_fn themselves, or the call
> > must be within "if (qemu_in_coroutine())". Apply coroutine_fn to
> > functions where this holds.
>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:49 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Callers of coroutine_fn must be coroutine_fn themselves, or the call
> must be within "if (qemu_in_coroutine())". Apply coroutine_fn to
> functions where this holds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> block.c | 6
Callers of coroutine_fn must be coroutine_fn themselves, or the call
must be within "if (qemu_in_coroutine())". Apply coroutine_fn to
functions where this holds.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
block.c | 6 +++---
block/block-backend.c | 10 +-
block/io.c|
