On Tue, Mar 22, 2022, 11:04 AM Hanna Reitz wrote:
> On 18.03.22 21:36, John Snow wrote:
> > Rework qemu_io() to be analogous to qemu_img(); a function that requires
> > a return code of zero by default unless disabled explicitly.
> >
> > Tests that use qemu_io():
> > 030 040 041 044 055 056 093
On 18.03.22 21:36, John Snow wrote:
Rework qemu_io() to be analogous to qemu_img(); a function that requires
a return code of zero by default unless disabled explicitly.
Tests that use qemu_io():
030 040 041 044 055 056 093 124 129 132 136 148 149 151 152 163 165 205
209 219 236 245 248 254 255
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022, 11:29 AM Eric Blake wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 04:36:46PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> > Rework qemu_io() to be analogous to qemu_img(); a function that requires
> > a return code of zero by default unless disabled explicitly.
> >
> > Tests that use qemu_io():
> > 030
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 04:36:46PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> Rework qemu_io() to be analogous to qemu_img(); a function that requires
> a return code of zero by default unless disabled explicitly.
>
> Tests that use qemu_io():
> 030 040 041 044 055 056 093 124 129 132 136 148 149 151 152 163 165
Rework qemu_io() to be analogous to qemu_img(); a function that requires
a return code of zero by default unless disabled explicitly.
Tests that use qemu_io():
030 040 041 044 055 056 093 124 129 132 136 148 149 151 152 163 165 205
209 219 236 245 248 254 255 257 260 264 280 298 300 302 304
