"Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" writes:
> On 18/09/2023 22:41, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> qemu_rdma_accept() returns 0 in some cases even when it didn't
>> complete its job due to errors. Impact is not obvious. I figure the
>> caller will soon fail again with a misleading error message.
>>
>> Fix it t
On 18/09/2023 22:41, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> qemu_rdma_accept() returns 0 in some cases even when it didn't
> complete its job due to errors. Impact is not obvious. I figure the
> caller will soon fail again with a misleading error message.
>
> Fix it to return -1 on any failure.
>
> Signe
Markus Armbruster writes:
> qemu_rdma_accept() returns 0 in some cases even when it didn't
> complete its job due to errors. Impact is not obvious. I figure the
> caller will soon fail again with a misleading error message.
>
> Fix it to return -1 on any failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbr
qemu_rdma_accept() returns 0 in some cases even when it didn't
complete its job due to errors. Impact is not obvious. I figure the
caller will soon fail again with a misleading error message.
Fix it to return -1 on any failure.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster
---
migration/rdma.c | 19 ++
