Re: [PATCH 1/2] iotests: Make _filter_img_create more active

2020-06-17 Thread Max Reitz
On 17.06.20 16:02, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 15:50 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: >> On 17.06.20 13:46, Maxim Levitsky wrote: >>> On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:17 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: Right now, _filter_img_create just filters out everything that looks format-dependent, and

Re: [PATCH 1/2] iotests: Make _filter_img_create more active

2020-06-17 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 15:50 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > On 17.06.20 13:46, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:17 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > > > Right now, _filter_img_create just filters out everything that looks > > > format-dependent, and applies some filename filters. That means

Re: [PATCH 1/2] iotests: Make _filter_img_create more active

2020-06-17 Thread Max Reitz
On 17.06.20 13:46, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:17 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: >> Right now, _filter_img_create just filters out everything that looks >> format-dependent, and applies some filename filters. That means that we >> have to add another filter line every time some

Re: [PATCH 1/2] iotests: Make _filter_img_create more active

2020-06-17 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:17 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > Right now, _filter_img_create just filters out everything that looks > format-dependent, and applies some filename filters. That means that we > have to add another filter line every time some format gets a new > creation option. This can be

[PATCH 1/2] iotests: Make _filter_img_create more active

2020-06-16 Thread Max Reitz
Right now, _filter_img_create just filters out everything that looks format-dependent, and applies some filename filters. That means that we have to add another filter line every time some format gets a new creation option. This can be avoided by instead discarding everything and just keeping