On 4/1/21 4:59 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 05:18:45PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 3/31/21 2:57 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:32:37PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 3/29/21 12:32 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 05:18:45PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 3/31/21 2:57 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:32:37PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/29/21 12:32 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >>> On 3/29/21 6:20 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 05:22:39PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 3/31/21 6:58 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > David Gibson writes:
> >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:32:37PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > ...
> >>
> >>> We assign ibm,chip-id=0x0 to CPUs 0-3, but CPUs 2-3 are located
On 3/31/21 7:29 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
> On 3/31/21 12:18 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 3/31/21 2:57 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:32:37PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 3/29/21 12:32 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 3/29/21
On 3/31/21 12:18 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 3/31/21 2:57 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:32:37PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 3/29/21 12:32 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 3/29/21 6:20 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:56:04AM +0100,
On 3/31/21 6:58 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> David Gibson writes:
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:32:37PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> ...
>>
>>> We assign ibm,chip-id=0x0 to CPUs 0-3, but CPUs 2-3 are located in a
>>> different NUMA node than 0-1. This would mean that the same socket
On 3/31/21 2:57 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:32:37PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/29/21 12:32 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> On 3/29/21 6:20 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:56:04AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On
David Gibson writes:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:32:37PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
...
>
>> We assign ibm,chip-id=0x0 to CPUs 0-3, but CPUs 2-3 are located in a
>> different NUMA node than 0-1. This would mean that the same socket
>> would belong to different NUMA nodes at the same
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:32:37PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 3/29/21 12:32 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > On 3/29/21 6:20 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:56:04AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > > > On 3/25/21 3:10 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > > >
On 3/29/21 8:51 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:03:58 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:34:52PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Kernel commit 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update
topology_core_cpumask") cause a regression in the pseries machine
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:32:37 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> On 3/29/21 12:32 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > On 3/29/21 6:20 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:56:04AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >>> On 3/25/21 3:10 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:03:58 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:34:52PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > Kernel commit 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update
> > topology_core_cpumask") cause a regression in the pseries machine when
> > defining certain SMP
On 3/29/21 12:32 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 3/29/21 6:20 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:56:04AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 3/25/21 3:10 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:21:33PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 3/22/21 10:03 PM,
On 3/29/21 6:20 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:56:04AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 3/25/21 3:10 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:21:33PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 3/22/21 10:03 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:56:04AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 3/25/21 3:10 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:21:33PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/22/21 10:03 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:34:52PM -0300, Daniel
On 3/25/21 5:56 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 3/25/21 3:10 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:21:33PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 3/22/21 10:03 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:34:52PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Kernel commit
On 3/25/21 3:10 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:21:33PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/22/21 10:03 PM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:34:52PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Kernel commit 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:21:33PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 3/22/21 10:03 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:34:52PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > > Kernel commit 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update
> > > topology_core_cpumask") cause a
On 3/22/21 10:03 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:34:52PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Kernel commit 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update
topology_core_cpumask") cause a regression in the pseries machine when
defining certain SMP topologies [1]. The reasoning
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:34:52PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Kernel commit 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update
> topology_core_cpumask") cause a regression in the pseries machine when
> defining certain SMP topologies [1]. The reasoning behind the change is
> explained in kernel
Kernel commit 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update
topology_core_cpumask") cause a regression in the pseries machine when
defining certain SMP topologies [1]. The reasoning behind the change is
explained in kernel commit 4ca234a9cbd7 ("powerpc/smp: Stop updating
cpu_core_mask"). In short,
21 matches
Mail list logo