Richard Henderson writes:
> We are not short of numbers for EXCP_*. There is no need to confuse things
> by having EXCP_VMEXIT and EXCP_SYSCALL overlap, even though the former is
> only used for system mode and the latter is only used for user mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
Revie
On 1/14/20 10:09 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
We are not short of numbers for EXCP_*. There is no need to confuse things
by having EXCP_VMEXIT and EXCP_SYSCALL overlap, even though the former is
only used for system mode and the latter is only used for user mode.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderso
We are not short of numbers for EXCP_*. There is no need to confuse things
by having EXCP_VMEXIT and EXCP_SYSCALL overlap, even though the former is
only used for system mode and the latter is only used for user mode.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target/i386/cpu.h | 5 ++---
1 file chan