Re: [PATCH 1/4] target/m68k: rename M68K_FEATURE_M68000 to M68K_FEATURE_M68K

2022-09-21 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 17/09/2022 à 13:25, Mark Cave-Ayland a écrit : The M68K_FEATURE_M68000 feature is misleading in that its name suggests the feature is defined just for Motorola 68000 CPUs, whilst in fact it is defined for all Motorola 680X0 CPUs. In order to avoid confusion with the other

Re: [PATCH 1/4] target/m68k: rename M68K_FEATURE_M68000 to M68K_FEATURE_M68K

2022-09-19 Thread Richard Henderson
On 9/17/22 13:25, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: The M68K_FEATURE_M68000 feature is misleading in that its name suggests the feature is defined just for Motorola 68000 CPUs, whilst in fact it is defined for all Motorola 680X0 CPUs. In order to avoid confusion with the other M68K_FEATURE_M680X0

Re: [PATCH 1/4] target/m68k: rename M68K_FEATURE_M68000 to M68K_FEATURE_M68K

2022-09-17 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
On 17/9/22 13:25, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: The M68K_FEATURE_M68000 feature is misleading in that its name suggests the feature is defined just for Motorola 68000 CPUs, whilst in fact it is defined for all Motorola 680X0 CPUs. In order to avoid confusion with the other M68K_FEATURE_M680X0

[PATCH 1/4] target/m68k: rename M68K_FEATURE_M68000 to M68K_FEATURE_M68K

2022-09-17 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
The M68K_FEATURE_M68000 feature is misleading in that its name suggests the feature is defined just for Motorola 68000 CPUs, whilst in fact it is defined for all Motorola 680X0 CPUs. In order to avoid confusion with the other M68K_FEATURE_M680X0 constants which define the features available for