> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Busch
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 6:04 PM
> To: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Klaus Jensen
>
> Cc: Niklas Cassel ; Dmitry Fomichev
> ; Kevin Wolf ; Philippe
> Mathieu-Daudé ; Keith Busch
> Subject
On Oct 1 06:05, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Sep 30 15:04, Keith Busch wrote:
> > The code switches on the opcode to invoke a function specific to that
> > opcode. There's no point in consolidating back to a common function that
> > just switches on that same opcode without any actual common code.
>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:48:03AM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Oct 1 06:05, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > On Sep 30 15:04, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > The code switches on the opcode to invoke a function specific to that
> > > opcode. There's no point in consolidating back to a common function that
>
On Oct 1 06:05, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Sep 30 15:04, Keith Busch wrote:
> > The code switches on the opcode to invoke a function specific to that
> > opcode. There's no point in consolidating back to a common function that
> > just switches on that same opcode without any actual common code.
>
On Sep 30 15:04, Keith Busch wrote:
> The code switches on the opcode to invoke a function specific to that
> opcode. There's no point in consolidating back to a common function that
> just switches on that same opcode without any actual common code.
> Restore the opcode specific behavior without
The code switches on the opcode to invoke a function specific to that
opcode. There's no point in consolidating back to a common function that
just switches on that same opcode without any actual common code.
Restore the opcode specific behavior without going back through another
level of
