On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 9:00 PM Warner Losh wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 12:34 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 8:14 PM Warner Losh wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 6:00 AM Richard Henderson
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 9/21/21 11:14 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>> >> >
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 12:34 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 8:14 PM Warner Losh wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 6:00 AM Richard Henderson <
> richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> On 9/21/21 11:14 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> >> > Create dummy signal queueing
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 8:14 PM Warner Losh wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 6:00 AM Richard Henderson
> wrote:
>> On 9/21/21 11:14 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>> > Create dummy signal queueing function so we can start to integrate other
>> > architectures (at the cost of signals remaining broken)
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 6:00 AM Richard Henderson <
richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 9/21/21 11:14 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> > Create dummy signal queueing function so we can start to integrate other
> > architectures (at the cost of signals remaining broken) to tame the
> > dependency
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 8:53 AM Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2021, 4:50 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> wrote:
>
>> On 9/22/21 08:14, Warner Losh wrote:
>> > Create dummy signal queueing function so we can start to integrate other
>> > architectures (at the cost of signals remaining
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021, 4:50 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
wrote:
> On 9/22/21 08:14, Warner Losh wrote:
> > Create dummy signal queueing function so we can start to integrate other
> > architectures (at the cost of signals remaining broken) to tame the
> > dependency graph a bit and to bring in
On 9/22/21 08:14, Warner Losh wrote:
Create dummy signal queueing function so we can start to integrate other
architectures (at the cost of signals remaining broken) to tame the
dependency graph a bit and to bring in signals in a more controlled
fashion.
Signed-off-by: Warner Losh
---
On 9/24/21 4:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
It brings to mind something else... There's times it might be easier
to refactor between bsd-user and linux-user rather than upstream
something that's largely copied from linux-user. Is there a good
way to do that and talk about the design before I sink a
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:11 PM Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 6:00 AM Richard Henderson
> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/21/21 11:14 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>> > Create dummy signal queueing function so we can start to integrate other
>> > architectures (at the cost of signals remaining
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 6:00 AM Richard Henderson <
richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 9/21/21 11:14 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> > Create dummy signal queueing function so we can start to integrate other
> > architectures (at the cost of signals remaining broken) to tame the
> > dependency
On 9/21/21 11:14 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
Create dummy signal queueing function so we can start to integrate other
architectures (at the cost of signals remaining broken) to tame the
dependency graph a bit and to bring in signals in a more controlled
fashion.
Signed-off-by: Warner Losh
---
Create dummy signal queueing function so we can start to integrate other
architectures (at the cost of signals remaining broken) to tame the
dependency graph a bit and to bring in signals in a more controlled
fashion.
Signed-off-by: Warner Losh
---
bsd-user/qemu.h | 1 +
bsd-user/signal.c | 8
12 matches
Mail list logo
