On 26.03.20 14:35, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 3/26/20 8:28 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 26.03.2020 um 14:20 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
+++ b/block/file-posix.c
@@ -3513,6 +3513,8 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_host_device = {
.bdrv_reopen_prepare = raw_reopen_prepare,
On 3/26/20 8:28 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 26.03.2020 um 14:20 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
+++ b/block/file-posix.c
@@ -3513,6 +3513,8 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_host_device = {
.bdrv_reopen_prepare = raw_reopen_prepare,
.bdrv_reopen_commit = raw_reopen_commit,
On Thu, 2020-03-26 at 08:20 -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 3/25/20 8:12 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Instead of checking the .bdrv_co_create_opts to see if we need the failback,
>
> fallback
100% true.
>
> > just implement the .bdrv_co_create_opts in the drivers that need it.
> >
> > This way
Am 26.03.2020 um 14:20 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> > +++ b/block/file-posix.c
> > @@ -3513,6 +3513,8 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_host_device = {
> > .bdrv_reopen_prepare = raw_reopen_prepare,
> > .bdrv_reopen_commit = raw_reopen_commit,
> > .bdrv_reopen_abort =
On 3/25/20 8:12 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Instead of checking the .bdrv_co_create_opts to see if we need the failback,
fallback
just implement the .bdrv_co_create_opts in the drivers that need it.
This way we don't break various places that need to know if the underlying
protocol/format
On 26.03.20 02:12, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Instead of checking the .bdrv_co_create_opts to see if we need the failback,
> just implement the .bdrv_co_create_opts in the drivers that need it.
>
> This way we don't break various places that need to know if the underlying
> protocol/format really
Instead of checking the .bdrv_co_create_opts to see if we need the failback,
just implement the .bdrv_co_create_opts in the drivers that need it.
This way we don't break various places that need to know if the underlying
protocol/format really supports image creation, and this way we still
allow
