On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 12:41 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2020 01:24:42 +
> "Verma, Vishal L" wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 17:16 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >
[..]
> > >
> > > There is ARM version of build_srat(),
> > > I suggest to put this NVDIMM specific part in
On Thu, 28 May 2020 01:24:42 +
"Verma, Vishal L" wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 17:16 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>
> Hi Igor, Thanks for the review.
>
> [..]
> > >
> > > @@ -2429,6 +2430,25 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> > > MachineState *machine)
> > >
On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 17:16 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Hi Igor, Thanks for the review.
[..]
> >
> > @@ -2429,6 +2430,25 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> > MachineState *machine)
> >MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
> > }
> > }
> > +
>
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:28:09 -0600
Vishal Verma wrote:
> NVDIMMs can belong to their own proximity domains, as described by the
> NFIT. In such cases, the SRAT needs to have Memory Affinity structures
> in the SRAT for these NVDIMMs, otherwise Linux doesn't populate node
> data structures
On 4/28/2020 9:28 AM, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
NVDIMMs can belong to their own proximity domains, as described by the
NFIT. In such cases, the SRAT needs to have Memory Affinity structures
in the SRAT for these NVDIMMs, otherwise Linux doesn't populate node
data structures properly during NUMA
NVDIMMs can belong to their own proximity domains, as described by the
NFIT. In such cases, the SRAT needs to have Memory Affinity structures
in the SRAT for these NVDIMMs, otherwise Linux doesn't populate node
data structures properly during NUMA initialization. See the following
for an example
