Re: [PATCH 2/3] linux-user: Rename user_force_sig tracepoint to match function name

2022-01-18 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 14/01/2022 à 16:37, Peter Maydell a écrit : In commit c599d4d6d6e9bfdb64 in 2016 we renamed the old force_sig() function to dump_core_and_abort(), but we forgot to rename the associated tracepoint. Rename the tracepoint to to match the function it's called from. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell

Re: [PATCH 2/3] linux-user: Rename user_force_sig tracepoint to match function name

2022-01-14 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
On 14/1/22 16:37, Peter Maydell wrote: In commit c599d4d6d6e9bfdb64 in 2016 we renamed the old force_sig() function to dump_core_and_abort(), but we forgot to rename the associated tracepoint. Rename the tracepoint to to match the function it's called from. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell ---

[PATCH 2/3] linux-user: Rename user_force_sig tracepoint to match function name

2022-01-14 Thread Peter Maydell
In commit c599d4d6d6e9bfdb64 in 2016 we renamed the old force_sig() function to dump_core_and_abort(), but we forgot to rename the associated tracepoint. Rename the tracepoint to to match the function it's called from. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell --- linux-user/signal.c | 2 +-