On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:40:47AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 4/11/21 10:08 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> > Not directly related to what you're trying to accomplish here, but the
> > whole vscr_sat thing looks really weird. I have no idea why we're
> > splitting out the storage of VSCR[SAT]
On 4/11/21 10:08 PM, David Gibson wrote:
Not directly related to what you're trying to accomplish here, but the
whole vscr_sat thing looks really weird. I have no idea why we're
splitting out the storage of VSCR[SAT] for the TCG case at all. If
you wanted to clean that up as a preliminary, I'd
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 12:19:14PM -0300, Bruno Larsen (billionai) wrote:
> this commit presents 2 possible solutions for substituting TCG emulation
> with KVM calls. One - used in machine.c and arch_dump.c - explicitly
> adds the KVM function and has the possibility of adding the TCG one
> for
"Bruno Larsen (billionai)" writes:
> this commit presents 2 possible solutions for substituting TCG emulation
> with KVM calls. One - used in machine.c and arch_dump.c - explicitly
As I mentioned in my reply to your introductory email I don't think we
should be replacing TCG routines with calls
this commit presents 2 possible solutions for substituting TCG emulation
with KVM calls. One - used in machine.c and arch_dump.c - explicitly
adds the KVM function and has the possibility of adding the TCG one
for more generic compilation, prioritizing te KVM option. The second
option, implemented