On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:50:39 +0100
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 27/11/20 11:50, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > it works in context of this series since
> >
> >+qemu_init_board();
> >+qemu_create_cli_devices();
> >+qemu_machine_creation_done();
> >
> > are called within the same
On 27/11/20 11:50, Igor Mammedov wrote:
it works in context of this series since
+qemu_init_board();
+qemu_create_cli_devices();
+qemu_machine_creation_done();
are called within the same command qmp_x_exit_preconfig,
if preconfig is enabled we happen to call
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 06:19:51 +0100
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/11/20 19:55, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:14:25 -0500
> > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >> The preconfig state is only used if -incoming is not specified, which
> >> makes the RunState state machine more tricky
On 26/11/20 19:55, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:14:25 -0500
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The preconfig state is only used if -incoming is not specified, which
makes the RunState state machine more tricky than it need be. However
there is already an equivalent condition which works
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:14:25 -0500
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The preconfig state is only used if -incoming is not specified, which
> makes the RunState state machine more tricky than it need be. However
> there is already an equivalent condition which works even with -incoming,
> namely
The preconfig state is only used if -incoming is not specified, which
makes the RunState state machine more tricky than it need be. However
there is already an equivalent condition which works even with -incoming,
namely qdev_hotplug. Use it instead of a separate runstate.
Signed-off-by: Paolo
