On 15/11/2020 15.34, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 15/11/20 15:00, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 14/11/2020 17.56, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote:
>>> Can we check this in meson.build?
>>
>> That would be nicer, indeed, but I did not spot a place where I could add my
>> code there ... all the other HAVE_xxx_H symb
On 15/11/20 15:00, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 14/11/2020 17.56, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote:
Can we check this in meson.build?
That would be nicer, indeed, but I did not spot a place where I could add my
code there ... all the other HAVE_xxx_H symbols are added in the configure
script.
There is one s
On 14/11/2020 17.56, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote:
> Can we check this in meson.build?
That would be nicer, indeed, but I did not spot a place where I could add my
code there ... all the other HAVE_xxx_H symbols are added in the configure
script.
Maybe Paolo or Marc-André (now on CC:) have an idea whet
On 11/14/20 11:51 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On Solaris and Haiku, the _IO() macros are defined in .
Add a proper check for this header to our configure scripts, and
make sure to include the header in tpm_ioctl.h to fix a build failure
on Solaris and Haiku.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
Reviewed-by:
Can we check this in meson.build?
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 12:53 AM Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On Solaris and Haiku, the _IO() macros are defined in .
> Add a proper check for this header to our configure scripts, and
> make sure to include the header in tpm_ioctl.h to fix a build failure
> on Solaris
On Solaris and Haiku, the _IO() macros are defined in .
Add a proper check for this header to our configure scripts, and
make sure to include the header in tpm_ioctl.h to fix a build failure
on Solaris and Haiku.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
---
backends/tpm/tpm_ioctl.h | 4
configure
