On 6/16/20 12:51 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> -reload = muldiv64(s->regs[WDT_RELOAD_VALUE], NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND,
> +reload = muldiv64(s->regs[WDT_RELOAD_VALUE],
> + NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND / SCALE_US,
>s->pclk_freq);
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020, at 18:13, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/22/20 2:21 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, at 13:11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> On 6/17/20 3:18 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, at 17:21, Philippe
On 6/22/20 2:21 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, at 13:11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On 6/17/20 3:18 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, at 17:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
The current implementation uses nano-second precision, while
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, at 13:11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 6/17/20 3:18 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, at 17:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> The current implementation uses nano-second precision, while
> >> the watchdog can not be more precise
Hi Andrew,
On 6/17/20 3:18 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, at 17:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> The current implementation uses nano-second precision, while
>> the watchdog can not be more precise than a micro-second.
>
> What's the basis for this assertion? It's true for
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, at 17:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The current implementation uses nano-second precision, while
> the watchdog can not be more precise than a micro-second.
What's the basis for this assertion? It's true for the AST2500 and AST2600, but
the AST2400 can run the
The current implementation uses nano-second precision, while
the watchdog can not be more precise than a micro-second.
Simplify by using a micro-second based timer.
Rename the timer 'timer_us' to have the unit explicit.
Inspired-by: Mark Cave-Ayland
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
