Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 00/28] target/arm: Allow CONFIG_TCG=n builds

2023-02-16 Thread Richard Henderson
On 2/16/23 06:47, Fabiano Rosas wrote: I'll try to split it up, let's see how it goes, the ARMCPRegInfo arrays are huge, they might end up pulling everything with them. Feel free to make static functions non-static in e.g. internals.h or cpregs.h as necessary to allow an array to be moved with

Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 00/28] target/arm: Allow CONFIG_TCG=n builds

2023-02-16 Thread Peter Maydell
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 16:47, Fabiano Rosas wrote: > > Peter Maydell writes: > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 20:31, Fabiano Rosas wrote: > >> > >> Hi, could someone take this? > >> > >> I rebased and put the two series together to simplify. I'm keeping it > >> up-to-date and tested while it doesn't

Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 00/28] target/arm: Allow CONFIG_TCG=n builds

2023-02-16 Thread Fabiano Rosas
Peter Maydell writes: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 20:31, Fabiano Rosas wrote: >> >> Hi, could someone take this? >> >> I rebased and put the two series together to simplify. I'm keeping it >> up-to-date and tested while it doesn't go in. >> >> CI run here: https://gitlab.com/farosas/qemu/-/pipeline

Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 00/28] target/arm: Allow CONFIG_TCG=n builds

2023-02-16 Thread Peter Maydell
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 16:19, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 20:31, Fabiano Rosas wrote: > > > > Hi, could someone take this? > > > > I rebased and put the two series together to simplify. I'm keeping it > > up-to-date and tested while it doesn't go in. > > > > CI run here: https

Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 00/28] target/arm: Allow CONFIG_TCG=n builds

2023-02-16 Thread Peter Maydell
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 20:31, Fabiano Rosas wrote: > > Hi, could someone take this? > > I rebased and put the two series together to simplify. I'm keeping it > up-to-date and tested while it doesn't go in. > > CI run here: https://gitlab.com/farosas/qemu/-/pipelines/776103500 > > Based on master.

[PATCH RESEND v5 00/28] target/arm: Allow CONFIG_TCG=n builds

2023-02-13 Thread Fabiano Rosas
Hi, could someone take this? I rebased and put the two series together to simplify. I'm keeping it up-to-date and tested while it doesn't go in. CI run here: https://gitlab.com/farosas/qemu/-/pipelines/776103500 Based on master. Supersedes "target/arm: CONFIG_TCG=n part 1". Thanks! v5: https:/