Re: [PATCH V2] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers

2020-11-05 Thread Markus Armbruster
AlexChen writes: > We should use printf format specifier PRIu32 instead of "%d" for > argument of type 'uint32_t'. I prefer v1, which uses %u. [...]

Re: [PATCH V2] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers

2020-11-04 Thread Thomas Huth
On 05/11/2020 07.50, AlexChen wrote: > We should use printf format specifier PRIu32 instead of "%d" for > argument of type 'uint32_t'. > > Reported-by: Euler Robot > Signed-off-by: Alex Chen > --- > tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 8 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

[PATCH V2] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers

2020-11-04 Thread AlexChen
We should use printf format specifier PRIu32 instead of "%d" for argument of type 'uint32_t'. Reported-by: Euler Robot Signed-off-by: Alex Chen --- tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c