On 6/7/23 06:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
30.05.2023 16:12, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
It is possible to store a very large value to the decrementer that it
does not raise the decrementer exception so the timer is scheduled, but
the next time value wraps and is treated as in the past.
This can
30.05.2023 16:12, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
It is possible to store a very large value to the decrementer that it
does not raise the decrementer exception so the timer is scheduled, but
the next time value wraps and is treated as in the past.
This can occur if (u64)-1 is stored on a zero-triggered
On 5/30/23 10:12, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
It is possible to store a very large value to the decrementer that it
does not raise the decrementer exception so the timer is scheduled, but
the next time value wraps and is treated as in the past.
This can occur if (u64)-1 is stored on a
It is possible to store a very large value to the decrementer that it
does not raise the decrementer exception so the timer is scheduled, but
the next time value wraps and is treated as in the past.
This can occur if (u64)-1 is stored on a zero-triggered exception, or
(u64)-1 is stored twice on
