On Wed, 22 Sept 2021 at 14:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Sept 2021 at 12:41, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 18:17, Peter Maydell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 17:05, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > I'd argue that compliance with the architecture
On Wed, 22 Sept 2021 at 12:41, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 18:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 17:05, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > I'd argue that compliance with the architecture means that the
> > > software should not clear RES1 bits
> >
> >
On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 18:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 17:05, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > I'd argue that compliance with the architecture means that the
> > software should not clear RES1 bits
>
> Architecturally, RES1 means that "software
> * Must not rely on the bit
On 16.09.21 17:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 16:30, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 16.09.21 14:24, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 19:10, Alexander Graf wrote:
Now that we have working system register sync, we push more target CPU
properties into
On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 17:05, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> I'd argue that compliance with the architecture means that the
> software should not clear RES1 bits
Architecturally, RES1 means that "software
* Must not rely on the bit reading as 1.
* Must use an SBOP policy to write to the bit."
On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 16:30, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 16.09.21 14:24, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 19:10, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> Now that we have working system register sync, we push more target CPU
> >> properties into the virtual machine. That might be useful
On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 17:56, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 16:30, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 16.09.21 14:24, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 19:10, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > >> Now that we have working system register sync, we push more target
On 16.09.21 14:24, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 19:10, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Now that we have working system register sync, we push more target CPU
>> properties into the virtual machine. That might be useful in some
>> situations, but is not the typical case that users
On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 19:10, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> Now that we have working system register sync, we push more target CPU
> properties into the virtual machine. That might be useful in some
> situations, but is not the typical case that users want.
>
> So let's add a -cpu host option that
Now that we have working system register sync, we push more target CPU
properties into the virtual machine. That might be useful in some
situations, but is not the typical case that users want.
So let's add a -cpu host option that allows them to explicitly pass all
CPU capabilities of their host
10 matches
Mail list logo