Re: [PATCH v2] block/blklogwrites: Protect mutable driver state with a mutex.

2024-01-19 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 19.01.2024 um 17:55 hat Ari Sundholm geschrieben: > On 1/18/24 21:18, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 11.01.2024 um 17:32 hat Ari Sundholm geschrieben: > > > During the review of a fix for a concurrency issue in blklogwrites, > > > it was found that the driver needs an additional fix when enabling > >

Re: [PATCH v2] block/blklogwrites: Protect mutable driver state with a mutex.

2024-01-19 Thread Ari Sundholm
On 1/18/24 21:18, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 11.01.2024 um 17:32 hat Ari Sundholm geschrieben: During the review of a fix for a concurrency issue in blklogwrites, it was found that the driver needs an additional fix when enabling multiqueue, which is a new feature introduced in QEMU 9.0, as the driver

Re: [PATCH v2] block/blklogwrites: Protect mutable driver state with a mutex.

2024-01-18 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 11.01.2024 um 17:32 hat Ari Sundholm geschrieben: > During the review of a fix for a concurrency issue in blklogwrites, > it was found that the driver needs an additional fix when enabling > multiqueue, which is a new feature introduced in QEMU 9.0, as the > driver state may be read and written

[PATCH v2] block/blklogwrites: Protect mutable driver state with a mutex.

2024-01-11 Thread Ari Sundholm via
During the review of a fix for a concurrency issue in blklogwrites, it was found that the driver needs an additional fix when enabling multiqueue, which is a new feature introduced in QEMU 9.0, as the driver state may be read and written by multiple threads at the same time, which was not the case