Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 11.05.23 15:00, Juan Quintela wrote:
+Now we start with the more interesting cases. Let start with the
+same qemu but not the same machine type.
>>> sounds like "different machine type on source and target" for me..
>>>
>>> Maybe, "not latest mac
On 11.05.23 15:00, Juan Quintela wrote:
+Now we start with the more interesting cases. Let start with the
+same qemu but not the same machine type.
sounds like "different machine type on source and target" for me..
Maybe, "not latest machine type" ?
Now we start with the more interesting case
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 11.05.23 11:27, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> State what are the requeriments to get migration working between qemu
>> versions. And once there explain how one is supposed to implement a
>> new feature/default value and not break migration.
>> Signed-off-by: Jua
On 11.05.23 11:27, Juan Quintela wrote:
State what are the requeriments to get migration working between qemu
versions. And once there explain how one is supposed to implement a
new feature/default value and not break migration.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
In general looks good to me:
Revi
State what are the requeriments to get migration working between qemu
versions. And once there explain how one is supposed to implement a
new feature/default value and not break migration.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
---
[v2]
- Add all danp fixes
[v1]
I will really appreciate reviews:
- I
