Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] s390x: CPU Topology

2021-08-30 Thread Pierre Morel
On 8/30/21 11:54 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: On 26.08.21 11:22, Pierre Morel wrote: a gentle ping :) I would like if you have time, comments on the architecture I propose, if the handling is done at the right level, KVM vs QEMU. Do we expect changes in this series due to the discus

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] s390x: CPU Topology

2021-08-30 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 26.08.21 11:22, Pierre Morel wrote: a gentle ping :) I would like if you have time, comments on the architecture I propose, if the handling is done at the right level, KVM vs QEMU. Do we expect changes in this series due to the discussed changes of PTF interpretion? Therefor I added

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] s390x: CPU Topology

2021-08-26 Thread Pierre Morel
a gentle ping :) I would like if you have time, comments on the architecture I propose, if the handling is done at the right level, KVM vs QEMU. Therefor I added Viktor as CC. This series is independent of the changes on -smp from Yanan Wang currently reviewed in main line. Thanks, Regard

[PATCH v2 0/5] s390x: CPU Topology

2021-07-22 Thread Pierre Morel
Hi, This series is a first part of the implementation of CPU topology for S390 greatly reduced from the first spin. In particular, we reduced the scope to the S390x specificities, removing all code touching to SMP or NUMA, with the goal to: - facilitate review and acceptance - let for later the S