Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] target/riscv: add 'vlenb' field in cpu->cfg

On 1/16/24 09:25, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: Our usage of 'vlenb' is overwhelming superior than the use of 'vlen'. We're using 'vlenb' most of the time, having to do 'vlen >> 3' or 'vlen / 8' in every instance. In hindsight we would be better if the 'vlenb' property was introduced instead

[PATCH v2 01/12] target/riscv: add 'vlenb' field in cpu->cfg

Our usage of 'vlenb' is overwhelming superior than the use of 'vlen'. We're using 'vlenb' most of the time, having to do 'vlen >> 3' or 'vlen / 8' in every instance. In hindsight we would be better if the 'vlenb' property was introduced instead of 'vlen'. That's not what happened, and now we