On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:06:35AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > We no longer wish to have commands implemented in HMP only. All commands
> > should start with a QMP implementation and the HMP merely be a shim
> > around this. To reduce the burden of
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> We no longer wish to have commands implemented in HMP only. All commands
> should start with a QMP implementation and the HMP merely be a shim
> around this. To reduce the burden of implementing QMP commands where
> there is low expectation of machine usage,
We no longer wish to have commands implemented in HMP only. All commands
should start with a QMP implementation and the HMP merely be a shim
around this. To reduce the burden of implementing QMP commands where
there is low expectation of machine usage, requirements for QAPI
modelling are relaxed
