Cornelia Huck writes:
> On Tue, 5 May 2020 17:29:17 +0200
> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Both s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256].name and
>> s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_EAES_256].name is
>> "pcc-cmac-eaes-256". The former is obviously a pasto.
>>
>> Impact:
>>
>> *
David Hildenbrand writes:
> On 05.05.20 17:29, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Both s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256].name and
>> s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_EAES_256].name is
>> "pcc-cmac-eaes-256". The former is obviously a pasto.
>>
>> Impact:
>>
>> * s390_feat_bitmap_to_ascii()
On 05.05.20 17:29, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Both s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256].name and
> s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_EAES_256].name is
> "pcc-cmac-eaes-256". The former is obviously a pasto.
>
> Impact:
>
> * s390_feat_bitmap_to_ascii() misidentifies
On Tue, 5 May 2020 17:29:17 +0200
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Both s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256].name and
> s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_EAES_256].name is
> "pcc-cmac-eaes-256". The former is obviously a pasto.
>
> Impact:
>
> * s390_feat_bitmap_to_ascii() misidentifies
Both s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256].name and
s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_EAES_256].name is
"pcc-cmac-eaes-256". The former is obviously a pasto.
Impact:
* s390_feat_bitmap_to_ascii() misidentifies S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256
as "pcc-cmac-eaes-256". Affects QMP commands