On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:56:06AM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 13:38 +, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 06:50:09PM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
[...]
> > > 2) Each x86 cpudef CPU model has 1 unversioned cpu_model_type then
> > > its
> > > versioned
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 13:38 +, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 06:50:09PM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 10:00 -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 02:22:51PM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 14:15 -0400, Eduardo
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 06:50:09PM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 10:00 -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 02:22:51PM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 14:15 -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
[...]
> > > > > +static void
On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 10:00 -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 02:22:51PM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 14:15 -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > > @@ -1129,6 +1130,12 @@ void machine_run_board_init(MachineState
> > > > *machine)
>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 02:22:51PM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 14:15 -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch, and sorry for taking so long to review
> > this. I'm finally getting to the patches that were postponed to
> > 5.2.
> >
> > Comments and
On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 14:15 -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patch, and sorry for taking so long to review
> this. I'm finally getting to the patches that were postponed to
> 5.2.
>
> Comments and questions below:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:47:55AM +0800, Robert Hoo
On 9/10/20 9:12 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 07:29:03AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 9/9/20 8:15 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patch, and sorry for taking so long to review
>>> this. I'm finally getting to the patches that were
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 07:29:03AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 9/9/20 8:15 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch, and sorry for taking so long to review
> > this. I'm finally getting to the patches that were postponed to
> > 5.2.
>
> Sorry I missed that
On 9/9/20 8:15 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patch, and sorry for taking so long to review
> this. I'm finally getting to the patches that were postponed to
> 5.2.
Sorry I missed that patch too.
Why restrict this to CPUClass, and not provide this feature to
all
Hi,
Thanks for the patch, and sorry for taking so long to review
this. I'm finally getting to the patches that were postponed to
5.2.
Comments and questions below:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:47:55AM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> Complement versioned CPU model framework with the ability of marking
Hi, Ping for comments:)
On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 10:47 +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> Complement versioned CPU model framework with the ability of marking
> some
> versions deprecated. When that CPU model is chosen, get some warning.
> The
> warning message is customized, e.g. telling in which future
Complement versioned CPU model framework with the ability of marking some
versions deprecated. When that CPU model is chosen, get some warning. The
warning message is customized, e.g. telling in which future QEMU version will
it be obsoleted.
The deprecation message will also appear by
12 matches
Mail list logo
