On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 00:32, Richard Henderson
wrote:
> It might be clearer to use dup_const for each case, which would more closely
> match the pseudocode. E.g. here,
>
> return dup_const(MO_16, imm << 8);
>
> > +imm |= (imm << 8) | (imm << 16) | (imm << 24);
>
> return
On 5/22/20 7:55 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Convert the insns in the one-register-and-immediate group to decodetree.
>
> In the new decode, our asimd_imm_const() function returns a 64-bit value
> rather than a 32-bit one, which means we don't need to treat cmode=14 op=1
> as a special case in the
Convert the insns in the one-register-and-immediate group to decodetree.
In the new decode, our asimd_imm_const() function returns a 64-bit value
rather than a 32-bit one, which means we don't need to treat cmode=14 op=1
as a special case in the decoder (it is the only encoding where the two
