* David Hildenbrand (da...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 12.02.20 14:42, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > We already allow resizable ram blocks for anonymous memory, however, they
> > are not actually resized. All memory is mmaped() R/W, including the memory
> > exceeding the used_length, up to the
On 12.02.20 19:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 12.02.20 14:42, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> We already allow resizable ram blocks for anonymous memory, however, they
>> are not actually resized. All memory is mmaped() R/W, including the memory
>> exceeding the used_length, up to the max_length.
On 12.02.20 14:42, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> We already allow resizable ram blocks for anonymous memory, however, they
> are not actually resized. All memory is mmaped() R/W, including the memory
> exceeding the used_length, up to the max_length.
>
> When resizing, effectively only the boundary
We already allow resizable ram blocks for anonymous memory, however, they
are not actually resized. All memory is mmaped() R/W, including the memory
exceeding the used_length, up to the max_length.
When resizing, effectively only the boundary is moved. Implement actually
resizable anonymous
