On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 7:17 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/22/23 02:29, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 9:24 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> riscv_cpu_realize_tcg() was added to allow TCG cpus to have a different
> >> realize() path during the
On 9/22/23 02:29, Alistair Francis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 9:24 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
riscv_cpu_realize_tcg() was added to allow TCG cpus to have a different
realize() path during the common riscv_cpu_realize(), making it a good
choice to start moving TCG exclusive code
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 9:24 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
> riscv_cpu_realize_tcg() was added to allow TCG cpus to have a different
> realize() path during the common riscv_cpu_realize(), making it a good
> choice to start moving TCG exclusive code to tcg-cpu.c.
>
> Rename it to
riscv_cpu_realize_tcg() was added to allow TCG cpus to have a different
realize() path during the common riscv_cpu_realize(), making it a good
choice to start moving TCG exclusive code to tcg-cpu.c.
Rename it to tcg_cpu_realizefn() and assign it as a implementation of
accel::cpu_realizefn().