On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:16 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
wrote:
> On 2/13/20 2:59 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 16:57, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>
> >> With the exception of the ignore_memory_transaction_failures
> >> flag set for the raspi2, both machine_class_init()
On 2/13/20 3:32 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 14:16, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 2/13/20 2:59 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
The natural way to implement this is to have the .class_data
be a pointer to a struct which is in an array and defines
relevant per-class stuff, the
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 14:16, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 2/13/20 2:59 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > The natural way to implement this is to have the .class_data
> > be a pointer to a struct which is in an array and defines
> > relevant per-class stuff, the same way we do in
> >
On 2/13/20 2:59 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 16:57, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
With the exception of the ignore_memory_transaction_failures
flag set for the raspi2, both machine_class_init() methods
are now identical. Merge them to keep a unique method.
Signed-off-by:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 16:57, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> With the exception of the ignore_memory_transaction_failures
> flag set for the raspi2, both machine_class_init() methods
> are now identical. Merge them to keep a unique method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> ---
>
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 17:56:44 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> With the exception of the ignore_memory_transaction_failures
> flag set for the raspi2, both machine_class_init() methods
> are now identical. Merge them to keep a unique method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
With the exception of the ignore_memory_transaction_failures
flag set for the raspi2, both machine_class_init() methods
are now identical. Merge them to keep a unique method.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
hw/arm/raspi.c | 31 ++-
1 file changed, 6
