Re: [PATCH v4] 9pfs: deprecate 'proxy' backend

2023-06-26 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
On Monday, June 26, 2023 9:27:35 AM CEST Greg Kurz wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 14:41:15 +0200 > Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > > As recent CVE-2023-2861 once again showed, the 9p 'proxy' fs driver is in > > bad shape. Using the 'proxy' backend was already discouraged for safety > > reasons

Re: [SPAM] [PATCH v4] 9pfs: deprecate 'proxy' backend

2023-06-26 Thread Greg Kurz
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 14:41:15 +0200 Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > As recent CVE-2023-2861 once again showed, the 9p 'proxy' fs driver is in > bad shape. Using the 'proxy' backend was already discouraged for safety > reasons before and we recommended to use the 'local' backend (preferably > in

[PATCH v4] 9pfs: deprecate 'proxy' backend

2023-06-23 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
As recent CVE-2023-2861 once again showed, the 9p 'proxy' fs driver is in bad shape. Using the 'proxy' backend was already discouraged for safety reasons before and we recommended to use the 'local' backend (preferably in conjunction with its 'mapped' security model) instead, but now it is time to