On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 03:25:45 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 03:28:56PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > Whilst I'm an optimist, I suspect this is now 8.1 material because we have
> > 5 CXL patch sets outstanding before it. Current bottleneck being QAPI review
> >
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 03:28:56PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Whilst I'm an optimist, I suspect this is now 8.1 material because we have
> 5 CXL patch sets outstanding before it. Current bottleneck being QAPI review
> for the RAS error series.
RAS thing is in, right?
could you rebase this
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 03:28:56PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Whilst I'm an optimist, I suspect this is now 8.1 material because we have
> 5 CXL patch sets outstanding before it.
Yea let's not. I merged what I felt is safe.
> Current bottleneck being QAPI review
> for the RAS error series.
Whilst I'm an optimist, I suspect this is now 8.1 material because we have
5 CXL patch sets outstanding before it. Current bottleneck being QAPI review
for the RAS error series.
v4 changes: Thanks to Ira and to some feedback I received off list.
- More endian fixes for a future big endian
