On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 08:33:18PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> (addded linux-api)
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 09:21:09PM +0800, Chao Peng wrote:
> > This is the v4 of this series which try to implement the fd-based KVM
> > guest private memory. The patches are based on latest kvm/queue branch
>
(addded linux-api)
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 09:21:09PM +0800, Chao Peng wrote:
> This is the v4 of this series which try to implement the fd-based KVM
> guest private memory. The patches are based on latest kvm/queue branch
> commit:
>
> fea31d169094 KVM: x86/pmu: Fix available_event_types check
> On Feb 2, 2022, at 1:23 AM, Steven Price wrote:
>
> Hi Jun,
>
> On 02/02/2022 02:28, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 28, 2022, at 8:47 AM, Steven Price wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18/01/2022 13:21, Chao Peng wrote:
This is the v4 of this series which try to implement the fd-based KVM
gu
Hi Jun,
On 02/02/2022 02:28, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
>
>> On Jan 28, 2022, at 8:47 AM, Steven Price wrote:
>>
>> On 18/01/2022 13:21, Chao Peng wrote:
>>> This is the v4 of this series which try to implement the fd-based KVM
>>> guest private memory. The patches are based on latest kvm/queue branch
> On Jan 28, 2022, at 8:47 AM, Steven Price wrote:
>
> On 18/01/2022 13:21, Chao Peng wrote:
>> This is the v4 of this series which try to implement the fd-based KVM
>> guest private memory. The patches are based on latest kvm/queue branch
>> commit:
>>
>> fea31d169094 KVM: x86/pmu: Fix availa
On 18/01/2022 13:21, Chao Peng wrote:
> This is the v4 of this series which try to implement the fd-based KVM
> guest private memory. The patches are based on latest kvm/queue branch
> commit:
>
> fea31d169094 KVM: x86/pmu: Fix available_event_types check for
>REF_CPU_CYCLES even
This is the v4 of this series which try to implement the fd-based KVM
guest private memory. The patches are based on latest kvm/queue branch
commit:
fea31d169094 KVM: x86/pmu: Fix available_event_types check for
REF_CPU_CYCLES event
Introduction
In general this patch