On 6/13/2024 4:26 PM, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
+ *
+ * It also has side effect to enable unsupported bits, e.g., the
+ * bits of "fixed0" type while present natively. It's safe because
+ * the unsupported bits will be masked off by .fixed0 later.
+ */
+ *ret |=
>-Original Message-
>From: Li, Xiaoyao
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/65] i386/tdx: Adjust the supported CPUID based
>on TDX restrictions
>
>On 5/31/2024 4:47 PM, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
>>
>> On 2/29/2024 2:36 PM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>>> According t
On 5/31/2024 4:47 PM, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
On 2/29/2024 2:36 PM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
According to Chapter "CPUID Virtualization" in TDX module spec, CPUID
bits of TD can be classified into 6 types:
1 | As configured |
On 2/29/2024 2:36 PM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
According to Chapter "CPUID Virtualization" in TDX module spec, CPUID
bits of TD can be classified into 6 types:
1 | As configured | configurable by VMM, independent of native
According to Chapter "CPUID Virtualization" in TDX module spec, CPUID
bits of TD can be classified into 6 types:
1 | As configured | configurable by VMM, independent of native value;
