Hi Jonathan,
On 4/14/22 5:33 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:35:41 +0800
Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/14/22 10:49 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 10:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/14/22 10:27 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 8:08, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/13/22 8:39 PM,
Hi Yanan,
On 4/14/22 5:29 PM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 15:35, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/14/22 10:49 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 10:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/14/22 10:27 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 8:08, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/13/22 8:39 PM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:35:41 +0800
Gavin Shan wrote:
> Hi Yanan,
>
> On 4/14/22 10:49 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
> > On 2022/4/14 10:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> On 4/14/22 10:27 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
> >>> On 2022/4/14 8:08, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On 4/13/22 8:39 PM, wangyanan (Y)
On 2022/4/14 15:35, Gavin Shan wrote:
Hi Yanan,
On 4/14/22 10:49 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 10:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/14/22 10:27 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 8:08, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/13/22 8:39 PM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/3 22:59, Gavin Shan wrote:
Hi Yanan,
On 4/14/22 10:49 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 10:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/14/22 10:27 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 8:08, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/13/22 8:39 PM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/3 22:59, Gavin Shan wrote:
Currently, the SMP configuration isn't
On 2022/4/14 10:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
Hi Yanan,
On 4/14/22 10:27 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 8:08, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/13/22 8:39 PM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/3 22:59, Gavin Shan wrote:
Currently, the SMP configuration isn't considered when the CPU
topology is populated.
Hi Yanan,
On 4/14/22 10:27 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 8:08, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/13/22 8:39 PM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/3 22:59, Gavin Shan wrote:
Currently, the SMP configuration isn't considered when the CPU
topology is populated. In this case, it's impossible to
On 2022/4/14 8:08, Gavin Shan wrote:
Hi Yanan,
On 4/13/22 8:39 PM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/3 22:59, Gavin Shan wrote:
Currently, the SMP configuration isn't considered when the CPU
topology is populated. In this case, it's impossible to provide
the default CPU-to-NUMA mapping or
Hi Yanan,
On 4/13/22 8:39 PM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/3 22:59, Gavin Shan wrote:
Currently, the SMP configuration isn't considered when the CPU
topology is populated. In this case, it's impossible to provide
the default CPU-to-NUMA mapping or association based on the socket
ID of the
Hi Gavin,
On 2022/4/3 22:59, Gavin Shan wrote:
Currently, the SMP configuration isn't considered when the CPU
topology is populated. In this case, it's impossible to provide
the default CPU-to-NUMA mapping or association based on the socket
ID of the given CPU.
This takes account of SMP
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 18:48:00 +0800
Gavin Shan wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 4/4/22 4:39 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 10:59:51PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> Currently, the SMP configuration isn't considered when the CPU
> >> topology is populated. In this case, it's
Hi Daniel,
On 4/4/22 4:39 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 10:59:51PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
Currently, the SMP configuration isn't considered when the CPU
topology is populated. In this case, it's impossible to provide
the default CPU-to-NUMA mapping or association
On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 10:59:51PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> Currently, the SMP configuration isn't considered when the CPU
> topology is populated. In this case, it's impossible to provide
> the default CPU-to-NUMA mapping or association based on the socket
> ID of the given CPU.
>
> This takes
Currently, the SMP configuration isn't considered when the CPU
topology is populated. In this case, it's impossible to provide
the default CPU-to-NUMA mapping or association based on the socket
ID of the given CPU.
This takes account of SMP configuration when the CPU topology
is populated. The
14 matches
Mail list logo
