On 20.12.21 16:47, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
On 17/12/2021 13:29, Hanna Reitz wrote:
On 24.11.21 07:44, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
block_crypto_amend_options_generic_luks uses the block layer
permission API, therefore it should be called with the BQL held.
However, the same
On 17/12/2021 13:29, Hanna Reitz wrote:
On 24.11.21 07:44, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
block_crypto_amend_options_generic_luks uses the block layer
permission API, therefore it should be called with the BQL held.
However, the same function is being called ib two BlockDriver
s/ ib /
On 17.12.21 13:29, Hanna Reitz wrote:
On 24.11.21 07:44, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
block_crypto_amend_options_generic_luks uses the block layer
permission API, therefore it should be called with the BQL held.
However, the same function is being called ib two BlockDriver
s/ ib / by /
On 24.11.21 07:44, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
block_crypto_amend_options_generic_luks uses the block layer
permission API, therefore it should be called with the BQL held.
However, the same function is being called ib two BlockDriver
s/ ib / by /
callbacks: bdrv_amend_options (under
block_crypto_amend_options_generic_luks uses the block layer
permission API, therefore it should be called with the BQL held.
However, the same function is being called ib two BlockDriver
callbacks: bdrv_amend_options (under BQL) and bdrv_co_amend (I/O).
The latter is I/O because it is invoked
