On 23/09/2022 14.07, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 2:05 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
On 23/09/2022 13.46, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:35 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 23.09.22 13:19, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:47
On 23/09/2022 13.46, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:35 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 23.09.22 13:19, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:47 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
You must be fortunate if "one afternoon" is not a significant time
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 2:05 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On 23/09/2022 13.46, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:35 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23.09.22 13:19, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:47 PM David Hildenbrand
>
On 23.09.22 13:46, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:35 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 23.09.22 13:19, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:47 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
You must be fortunate if "one afternoon" is not a significant time
Hi David,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:35 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> On 23.09.22 13:19, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:47 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> You must be fortunate if "one afternoon" is not a significant time
> >> investment. For me it is a significant
On 23.09.22 13:19, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:47 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
You must be fortunate if "one afternoon" is not a significant time
investment. For me it is a significant investment.
For me too, to say the least of the multiple afternoons I've spent on
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:47 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
> You must be fortunate if "one afternoon" is not a significant time
> investment. For me it is a significant investment.
For me too, to say the least of the multiple afternoons I've spent on
this patch set. Getting back to technical
3) I won't follow up with additional cleanup patches because I already
spent more time on this than I originally planned.
What is this B.S.?
I spent months on this code and had to poke you a
bunch to review it. You spend one afternoon with it and you're already
burnt out, apparently. Sorry to
Hi David & Thomas,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 08:37:50AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > But the point is that the "msa" helper is also called for other instructions
> > like PCKMO which can also be called with code 3. And there it means
> > something completely different. ... unless I
On 23.09.22 08:23, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/09/2022 19.18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 22.09.22 17:55, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/09/2022 17.38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
In order to fully support MSA_EXT_5, we have to support the SHA-512
special instructions. So
On 22/09/2022 18.35, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 5:55 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/09/2022 17.38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
In order to fully support MSA_EXT_5, we have to support the SHA-512
special instructions. So implement those.
The
On 22/09/2022 19.18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 22.09.22 17:55, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/09/2022 17.38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
In order to fully support MSA_EXT_5, we have to support the SHA-512
special instructions. So implement those.
The implementation began
On 22.09.22 17:55, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/09/2022 17.38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
In order to fully support MSA_EXT_5, we have to support the SHA-512
special instructions. So implement those.
The implementation began as something TweetNacl-like, and then was
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 5:55 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On 22/09/2022 17.38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
> >
> > In order to fully support MSA_EXT_5, we have to support the SHA-512
> > special instructions. So implement those.
> >
> > The implementation began as
On 22/09/2022 17.38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
In order to fully support MSA_EXT_5, we have to support the SHA-512
special instructions. So implement those.
The implementation began as something TweetNacl-like, and then was
adjusted to be useful here. It's not very
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
In order to fully support MSA_EXT_5, we have to support the SHA-512
special instructions. So implement those.
The implementation began as something TweetNacl-like, and then was
adjusted to be useful here. It's not very beautiful, but it is quite
short and compact,
16 matches
Mail list logo
